Appeal No. 2005-2712
Application No. 10/408,302
directed to an automated flight simulation mission profiling apparatus (claim 32) and an
automated method for determining a flight simulation mission profile (claim 36). Copies
of independent claims 32 and 36 can be found in the Appendix attached to appellant’s
brief.
The sole prior art reference relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed
claims is:
Tang et al. (Tang) 6,134,500 Oct. 17, 2000
Claims 32 through 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated
by Tang.
Rather than attempt to reiterate the examiner's full commentary with respect to the
above-noted rejection and the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and
appellant regarding that rejection, we make reference to the final rejection (mailed May
27, 2004) and the examiner's answer (mailed March 22, 2005) for the reasoning in
support of the rejection, and to appellant’s brief (filed December 30, 2004) and reply
brief (filed May 2, 2005) for the arguments thereagainst.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007