Ex Parte Hey - Page 1



              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                     
              written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                     

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                  
                                          _____________                                              
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                     
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                            
                                          _____________                                              
                                        Ex parte JOHN HEY                                            
           _____________                                                                             
                                      Appeal No. 2005-2766                                           
                                   Application No. 09/682,659                                        
                                          ______________                                             
                                             ON BRIEF                                                
                                         _______________                                             
           Before BARRETT, OWENS and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges                             
           OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       

                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                 This appeal is from a rejection of claims 14-19, 21-26, 41                          
           and 42.  Claims 1-13, 20, 27-40 and 43 have been canceled.                                
                                          THE INVENTION                                              
                 The appellant claims a stereoscopic image display structure                         
           and a system for viewing it.  Claims 14 and 41 are illustrative:                          





                                                 1                                                   




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007