Appeal No. 2006-0020 Παγε 6
Application No. 09/984,009
alone, are not "evidence." In re Dembiczak, 175 F.3d 994, 999, 50 USPQ2d 1614,
1617 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
In light of the above, the rejections of claims 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 23-25, 28, 29, 31,
32 and 34 as being unpatentable over Shimano in view of McMaster and Lee and
claims 15 and 30 as being unpatentable over Shimano in view of McMaster, Lee and
Hoh are reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007