The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RALF OESTREICHER et al.
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0022
Application No. 09/810,943
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 36 to 55,
61 to 64 and 69 to 72. Claims 56 and 57 have been allowed. Claims 58 to 60, 65 to 68
and 73, which are all of the other claims pending in this application, have been objected
to as depending from a non-allowed claim.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007