UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte BRIAN JAMES GINGRAS et al.
______________
Appeal No. 2006-0111
Application 09/900,746
________
_______________
ON APPEAL
_______________
Before PAK, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 through 7 and 9 through 48. Claims 49
through 62, the remaining claims pending in this application, stand
withdrawn from further consideration as directed to a non-elected
invention (Brief, page 3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35
U.S.C. § 134.
According to appellants, the invention is directed to a method
for making wet rolls which includes applying a wetting solution to a
web of material, breaking the wet web, and winding the wet web into
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007