Appeal No. 2006-0112 Παγε 2
Application No. 10/194,739
The appellant’s invention relates to projectile with novel aerodynamic shape
(specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to
the appellant's brief.
THE PRIOR ART
The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the
appealed claims are:
Antoine et al. (Antoine) 4,572,077 Feb. 25, 1986
McClain III (McClain) 5,164,538 Nov. 17, 1992
Kennedy et al. (Kennedy) 6,439,126 Aug. 27, 2002
Jones GB2236 Jan. 28, 1911
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 1, 2, 6, 8, and 11 to 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
anticipated by Jones.
Claims 3, 4 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Jones in view of Antoine.
Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Jones
in view of McClain.
Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Jones in view of Kennedy.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007