Appeal No. 2006-0123 Application 09/553,413 carriers made in the form of enveloping structures”. Since claim 15 is a subcombination claim which claims only the mold assembly rather than the manufacturing device claimed in combination claim 1, claim 15 does not include the mold carriers but, rather, limits the shape of the shell holders to be supported by two mold carriers made in the form of enveloping structures. That limitation appears in each of the other new independent claims in the reissue application, i.e., claims 35, 36 and 39. The examiner argues that the reissue claims are broader than the patent claims because the patent claims claim a combination which includes the mold carriers, whereas the reissue claims claim a subcombination which does not require the mold carriers (answer, pages 6-10). Thus, the examiner argues, the appellants are recapturing subject matter that does not require the mold carrier limitation. See id.1 1 The examiner also argues that “shell holders being shaped to be supported by two mold carriers made in the form of enveloping structures” does not limit the structure of the shell holders because no shape is given to the shell holders in figure 1 of the ‘560 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007