Ex Parte Hamamoto et al - Page 5



         Appeal No. 2006-0124                                                       
         Application No. 10/071,301                                                 

              The characteristics of the mordanting polymer that are                
         improved by the addition of a crosslinking agent are not                   
         properties sought for an adhesive material.  Accordingly, the              
         skilled artisan would not have considered the teachings of                 
         Buzzell to add a crosslinking agent to be applicable to Buzzell's          
         adhesive material.  Without the requisite teaching or suggestion           
         to use a crosslinking agent in the adhesive layer, the examiner            
         has failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness.                 
         Consequently, we cannot sustain the obviousness rejection of               
         claims 1 through 5, 9 through 12, and 19.                                  
              Each of claims 6 and 13 (the only independent claims in               
         Groups II and III) includes the same limitation recited in                 
         claim 1 of an adhesive layer comprising "a water-soluble                   
         crosslinking agent capable of crosslinking a vinyl alcohol-based           
         polymer."  Since neither Shulman nor Delangre remedies the                 
         deficiencies of Buzzell, we cannot sustain the obviousness                 
         rejection of claims 6 through 8 and 13 through 18.                         






                                         5                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007