Appeal No. 2006-0151 Page 5 Application No. 09/753,381 The specification also describes specific experiments in which two commercially available lecithin/lysolecithin surfactants, Lysoprin and Bolec MT (each of which contains approximately 33% lysophospholipids), were added to animal feed containing various exogenous enzymes (id., page 4). Tables 1 and 2 of the specification show the results obtained when “feed samples [were] treated with enzyme products and combinations of enzyme products with lysophospholipid/phospholipid type (LPC/PC-type) [ ] surfactants” (id., page 9). In certain cases, the “LPC/PC-type” surfactants contained 16% Lysoprin (S2) or 16% Bolec MT (S3) (id., Table 1, note 3; Table 2, notes 1 and 3). Thus the S2 and S3 surfactants, as used in the experiments, contained approximately 5% lysophospholipids. In addition, according to the specification, the data in Table 2 indicate that “further improvements can be achieved by choosing the best LPC/LP-type of surfactant, which in this case is the fully converted product, S4” (Specification, page 10). S4 is yet another surfactant described in U.S. Patent No. 6,068,997 “containing approx. 16% lysolecithin . . . by weight” (Specification, Table 2, note 5). Finally, as pointed out by appellants, Table 2 shows, among other things, that “degradation of neutral detergent fiber [(NDF)] by the exogenous enzyme ENZ-Xylanase at 250 Kg/T and the surfactant Tween (not a converted lecithin) resulted in an NDF degradation of 2.89%, whereas the ENZ-Xylanase at 250 Kg/T combined with . . . the surfactant S4 (a lysolecithin) resulted in an NDF degradation of 10.72%” (Reply Brief, page 4). Table 2 also shows that “NDF degradation by . . . the exogenous enzyme ENZ- Barley at a level of 500 Kg/T was 5.10% and [ ] NDF degradation by . . . ENZ-Barley at a level of 250 Kg/T with the addition of surfactant S2 (a lysolecithin) resulted in the same 5.10%” (id.).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007