Ex Parte Adler - Page 5


             3.  Scope of enablement                                                                                 
                    The examiner also rejected claims 158, 159, and 164-185 under 35 U.S.C.                          
             § 112, first paragraph, on the basis that “the specification does not enable any person                 
             skilled in the art to make and use the invention commensurate in scope with these                       
             claims.”  Examiner’s Answer, page 8.  The examiner noted that these claims                              
             “encompass polynucleotides encoding polypeptide variants of the polypeptide of SEQ                      
             ID NO:8[;] i.e., substitutions, deletions or insertions.”  Id., pages 8-9.  The examiner                
             reasoned “the specification has failed to teach one of ordinary skill in the art which                  
             amino acid substitutions, deletions or insertions to make that will preserve the structure              
             and function of the protein, that “no particular ligand has been disclosed to bind and                  
             activate the protein, so the artisan would not know how to test variants for functionality,”            
             that the specification provides no working examples of T2R61 variants, and that the                     
             prior art (including Chandrashekar) “recognizes the complexity, unpredictability, and                   
             non-routine nature of the work involved in trying to assay functional T2R receptors.  Id.,              
             pages 9-11.  The examiner concluded that undue experimentation would be required to                     
             make and use the claimed variants.                                                                      
                    Appellant argues that the claimed genera are limited to nucleic acids with a high                
             degree of similarity to SEQ ID NO:7 or encoding a protein very similar to SEQ ID NO:8,                  
             that such can be made or isolated routinely, and that the specification “provides                       
             substantial information relating to T2R assays that would enable one skilled in the art to              
             screen these variant hT2R61 nucleic acid sequences and identi[f]y those variants that                   
             are functional, i.e., bind the same bitter ligands which specifically interact with wild-type           
             hT2R61 polypeptide.”  Appeal Brief, pages 25-27.                                                        
                    “[T]o be enabling, the specification of a patent must teach those skilled in the art             
             how to make and use the full scope of the claimed invention without ‘undue                              
             experimentation.’”  In re Wright, 999 F.2d 1557, 1561, 27 USPQ2d 1510, 1513 (Fed.                       
             Cir. 1993).  “That some experimentation may be required is not fatal; the issue is                      
             whether the amount of experimentation required is ‘undue.’”  In re Vaeck, 947 F.2d 488,                 
             495, 20 USPQ2d 1438, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1991).  Whether the amount of experimentation                      
             required is undue is determined by reference to the well-known Wands factors.  See In                   
             re Wands, 858 F.2d 731, 737, 8 USPQ2d 1400, 1404 (Fed. Cir. 1988).                                      
                    In this case, we agree with Appellant that the examiner has not shown, by a                      
             preponderance of the evidence, that practicing the full scope of the claims would have                  
             required undue experimentation.  The examiner’s position rests in part on the lack of                   
             guidance in the specification regarding amino acids in T2R61 can be altered or deleted                  
             without affecting its function.                                                                         
                    It is true that the specification does not teach, in so many words, which amino                  
             acids are critical to T2R61 function.  However, the specification does provide substantial              
             guidance to those skilled in the art.  The specification provides the nucleotide and amino              
             acid sequences shown in SEQ ID Nos:7 and 8, which correspond to human T2R61.                            
             The specification also incorporates by reference the sequence comparison disclosed by                   
             Adler.2  Adler provides a sequence comparison of twenty-three human, mouse, and rat                     
             T2R amino acid sequences.  The comparison does not include human T2R61 but the                          
             examiner has given us no reason to think that a person skilled in the art could not apply               
             the same techniques used by Adler to the T2R61 sequence disclosed in the instant                        
             specification.                                                                                          
                    Adler’s sequence comparison identifies each of the seven transmembrane (TM)                      
             domains, and shows conserved regions between TM1 and TM2, between TM3 and                               
             TM4, and between TM5 and TM6.  By comparison, the regions between TM2 and TM3,                          
             between TM4 and TM5, and between TM6 and TM7 are much less conserved.  Such                             
             2 Adler et al., “A novel family of mammalian taste receptors,” Cell, Vol. 100, pp. 693-702 (2000).  Adler
             was incorporated by reference into the specification.  See page 8, lines 13-15.                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007