The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DENNIS A. KRAMER, FREDERICK A. JELLEY, JOSEPH A. KAY, JAMES R.
BRICHTA, DENNIS G. O'REILLY, CHRISTOPHER S. KEENEY and JAEHO KWAK
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0168
Application No. 10/459,052
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before OWENS, CRAWFORD, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 6, 8,
9 and 13 to 17.
The appellants' invention relates to a brake system for a motor vehicle
(specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to
the appellants' brief.
The prior art
The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the
appealed claims are:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007