The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte MATTHEW R. KASER, YALDA AZIMZAI, and HENRY YUE _______________ Appeal No. 2006-0186 Application 09/838,044 _______________ ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL _______________ Before FLEMING, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, HARKCOM, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge. Per curiam. Appellants were given a period of one month to respond to the “ORDER UNDER 37 CFR § 41.50(d)” mailed on December 23, 2005. The order also stated that “[f]ailure to respond in a timely manner will result in dismissal of the appeal.” Since no response has been received, the case is dismissed.Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007