Ex Parte Wang - Page 1




                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                  
                     written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  



                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                   ____________                                                          
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                   ____________                                                          
                                           Ex parte TINGHAO F. WANG                                                      
                                                   ____________                                                          
                                              Appeal No. 2006-0293                                                       
                                         Application No. 10/071,809                                                      
                                                   ____________                                                          
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                   ____________                                                          
              Before OWENS, WALTZ and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
              WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        



              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                         
                     This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of                      
              claims 1, 3 through 12, 14, 15, 21 through 23, 25 and 27, which are the only claims                        
              pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                            
                     According to appellant, the invention is directed to a method of etching a metal                    
              silicide layer while fabricating an integrated circuit using a chlorine/oxygen gas                         
              environment at a pressure of approximately 2 to 40 mili-Torr and an oxygen                                 


              concentration of greater than or equal to 25% by volume (Brief, page 2).                                   







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007