Appeal No. 2006-0294 Application No. 09/953,030 density foam of Thomas. The examiner has not provided any factual basis for concluding that a gel-like material would include high density foam. Also, the examiner has failed to make any correlation between the high density foam material of Thomas and the gel-like material of the present invention which, according to the supporting specification, should be a viscous material. Nor has the examiner presented any line of reasoning why it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to replace the high density foam of Thomas with a gel-like material. 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007