Ex Parte Ball et al - Page 3



           Appeal No. 2006-0305                                                        3                                
           Application No. 10/370,545                                                                                   


                 a hose fitting on the shower inlet; and                                                                
                 a hose removably connecting the shower inlet and the drain                                             
           adapter.                                                                                                     
                                          THE PRIOR ART                                                                 
                 The references relied on by the examiner as evidence of                                                
           obviousness are:                                                                                             
           Merritt                     608,207             Aug. 02, 1898                                                
           Coles                       964,954             Jul. 19, 1910                                                
           Jones                     1,013,175             Jan. 02, 1912                                                
           Davis                     2,966,311             Dec. 27, 1960                                                
           Lewis                  2002/0032926             Mar. 21, 2002                                                
                                         THE REJECTIONS                                                                 
                 Claims 1 and 4-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                                            
           being unpatentable over Merritt in view of Jones and Davis.                                                  
                 Claims 8, 10 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                                            
           as being unpatentable over Coles in view of Lewis, Jones and                                                 
           Davis.                                                                                                       
                 Attention is directed to the main and reply briefs (filed                                              
           April 25, 2005 and July 11, 2005) and answer (mailed May 25,                                                 



















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007