Ex Parte Visokay et al - Page 2



           Appeal No. 2006-0318                                                                    
           Application No. 10/195,271                                                              
           the gate materials either have different crystalline structures or                      
           one gate material is crystalline and the other is amorphous                             
           (specification, page 7).  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                      
                       1. An integrated circuit, comprising:                                       
                       (a) a substrate with NMOS and PMOS transistors;                             
                       (b) wherein said NMOS transistors have gates made of                        
                       a first gate material with a first texture directly                         
                       adjacent gate dielectric; and                                               
                       (c) wherein said PMOS transistors have gates made of                        
                       said first gate material with a second texture                              
                       directly adjacent gate dielectric, said first                               
                       texture and said second texture differing.                                  
                                          THE REFERENCES                                           
           Iwase et al. (Iwase)           5,097,311           Mar. 17, 1992                        
           Liang et al. (Liang)           6,130,123           Oct. 10, 2000                        
           Hsu                            6,258,643           Jul. 10, 2001                        
                                          THE REJECTIONS                                           
                 The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 1 and 5 under                        
           35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Hsu; claims 2 and 3 under                          
           35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Hsu in view of Lang; and claim 4                        
           under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Hsu in view of Iwase.                             
                                              OPINION                                              
                 We affirm the rejection of claims 1 and 5 and reverse the                         
           rejections of claims 2-4.                                                               
                                          Claims 1 and 5                                           
                 Hsu discloses an integrated circuit comprising an NMOS                            
           transistor having an N -type polysilicon gate (21A) and a PMOS+                                                             
                                                2                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007