Ex Parte Bander - Page 5



             Appeal No. 2006-0352                                                           Παγε 5               
             Application No. 09/929,546                                                                          
             inventor invented what is claimed.”  University of Rochester, 358 F.3d at 928, 69                   
             USPQ2d at 1896.  Whether or not a specification satisfies the requirement is a question             
             of fact, which must be resolved on a case-by-case basis (Vas-Cath, 935 F.2d at 1562-                
             63, 19 USPQ2d at 1116).                                                                             
                   Much has been said on both sides of this issue, but we agree with appellant that              
             the specification describes the disputed subgenus of antibodies, and that this “is not a            
             close case” (Reply Brief, page 1).  The specification describes a “process [which]                  
             involves providing a biological agent which . . . recognizes the extracellular domain of            
             prostate specific membrane antigen” (Specification, page 9).  “Preferred biological                 
             agents for use in the method . . . are antibodies or binding portions thereof, probes or            
             ligands” (id., page 10 ).  The specification further describes four “particularly preferred”        
             monoclonal antibodies which bind the extracellular domain of PSMA (id., page 24).                   
             Three of the antibodies, J591, J533, and E99, “interfere, compete, or block binding of              
             one another” to the same epitope on PSMA, but “do not block binding of [the fourth                  
             antibody,] J415[,] and vice versa” (id., page 43).  Moreover, the specification teaches             
             that “[s]uitable probes or ligands are molecules which bind to the . . . antigens identified        
             by the monoclonal antibodies of the present invention” (id., page 24), i.e., molecules              
             which bind the epitopes identified by J591, J533, E99 and J415.                                     
                   Thus, the specification explicitly describes both competing and non-competing                 
             antibodies, and also teaches that other biological agents that bind, or recognize, the              
             same sites identified by J591, J533, E99 and J415 are suitable for use in the claimed               
             method.  While it is true that the specification does not explicitly state that other               
             antibodies are included among suitable “molecules which bind to the . . . antigens                  
             identified by the monoclonal antibodies of the present invention,” we conclude that                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007