Ex Parte Klein et al - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2006-0366                                                        
          Application 10/382,285                                                      

               removing the elongated hollow tube member, thereby exposing the rod member
          affixed to the anchor.1                                                     
                                        THE PRIOR ART                                 
                                            The references relied on by               
          the examiner to support the final rejection are:                            
          O                          5,154,104                   Oct. 13, 1992        
          Strauch                    5,400,681              Mar. 28, 1995             
          Huang                      5,943,925               Aug. 31, 1999            
                                     THE REJECTIONS                                   
               Claims 1-4, 7-14, 18, and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.            
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over O in view of Huang.                     
               Claims 5, 6, 16, 17, and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over O in view of Huang and Strauch.         

                                                                                     
               1 In the event of further prosecution before the examiner,             
          steps should be taken to correct the lack of proper antecedent              
          basis in claim 19 for the terms “the socket end of the elongated            
          hollow tube member,” “the socket” and “the ceiling.”                        






                                            4                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007