Ex Parte Dominke et al - Page 6




             Appeal No. 2006-0373                                                               Παγε 6                                      
             Application No. 10/181,625                                                                                                     


             magnet, as in Figures 3a-3c.  Claims 24-27 are directed to the steer-by-wire system                                            
             incorporating the braking device of Figures 3a-3c and the steering wheel actuator 9                                            
             including a rotor and stator, an invention which, as discussed above, is fully described in                                    
             the appellants' specification so as to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and                                     
             use the invention.  Their dependence from claims 13 and 14 does not, as the examiner                                           
             suggests, constitute a combination of the two different braking devices of Figures 3a-3c                                       
             and Figures 4a-4c.  Independent claims 13 and 14 recite the braking device generically                                         
             and thus do not appear to be limited to either embodiment of braking device.                                                   
                    For the reasons discussed above, the examiner's rejection of claims 24-27 under                                         
             the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is reversed.                                                                            



































Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007