Ex Parte BAKKER - Page 6


               Appeal No. 2006-0445                                                                                                  
               Application 08/977,374                                                                                                

               pages 6-7).  Each of dependent claims 39, 42 and 44 specify that “first means comprises” at least                     
               a radiant energy absorbing coating.  In these claims, the other “first means” materials                               
               encompassed by the language in view of the open-ended term “comprises,” must be                                       
               “corresponding structure,” that is, another radiant absorbing coating or tinted film in the                           
               downward extending area.                                                                                              
                       We find that Heilman would have disclosed to one of ordinary skill in this art a piece of                     
               transparent heat shrinkable film, which can be a piece of severable film in a roll, that covers the                   
               open top of a container and extends downward around the upper rim of the container, wherein                           
               heat is applied to the downward extending portion of the film so as to shrink the film around the                     
               rim of the container (e.g., page 2, ll. 1-30, page 3, ll. 21-24, page 4, ll. 1-25, page 5, ll. 24-26,                 
               and pages 9-10; FIGs. 6 and 6a).  We further find that Heilman would have further disclosed to                        
               this person that “the edges of the film [can be] exposed . . . to heat caused by . . . infrared heat . .              
               . supplied . . . directly to the film in conventional manner” (page 9, ll. 18-23).  Thus, Heilman                     
               would have taught one of ordinary skill in this art that the downward extending portion of the                        
               shrinkable film can be heated and thus, shrunk around the rim of the container by infrared                            
               radiant energy supplied directly to the film in conventional manner.5                                                 
                       We find that Amberg would have disclosed to one of ordinary skill in this art that closure                    
               11 for open top container 12 has an annular shirt 15 of heat shrinkable material extending                            
               downward over the rim of container 12 which upon the application heat, is shrunk around the rim                       
               (e.g., col. 2, l. 61, to col. 4, l. 44, and col. 5, ll. 3-29; FIGs. 1 and 4).  Amberg would have further              
               disclosed to this person that where the “skirts [15 are] formed of a material opaque to infra-red                     
               radiation, the shrinkage thereof can be effected very expeditiously by infra-red means 19, shown                      
               as comprising an infra-red electrical bulb 21 . . . directed toward the closure skirt [15]” (e.g., col.               
               4, l. 44, to col. 5, l. 2; FIG. 1).                                                                                   
                       Anderson would have disclosed to one of ordinary skill in this art that heat can be                           

                                                                                                                                    
               5  It is well settled that a reference stands for all of the specific teachings thereof as well as the                
               inferences one of ordinary skill in this art would have reasonably been expected to draw                              
               therefrom, see In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1264-65, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1782-83 (Fed. Cir.                               
               1992); In re Preda, 401 F.2d 825, 826, 159 USPQ 342, 344 (CCPA 1968), presuming skill on                              
               the part of this person.  In re Sovish, 769 F.2d 738, 743, 226 USPQ 771, 774 (Fed. Cir. 1985).                        

                                                                - 6 -                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007