Ex Parte Burnett et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-0456                                        Page 2          
          Application No. 10/410,778                                                  

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants’ invention relates to a quad roll decurler              
          wherein the degree of curl can be adjusted (specification, pages            
          1 and 6).                                                                   
               Claim 1 is representative of the invention, and is                     
          reproduced as follows:                                                      
               1. A quad-roll curl control apparatus comprising:                      
               first, second, third, and fourth rolls configured to form              
          first and second nips;                                                      
               the first nip comprising the first and third rolls;                    
               the second nip comprising the second and fourth rolls;                 
               respective bearings supporting ends of the first and second            
          rolls;                                                                      
               the third and fourth rolls each having a substantially                 
          uncompressible surface;                                                     
               the first and second rolls each having a compressible                  
          surface into which the third and fourth rolls selectively                   
          penetrate, respectively;                                                    
               a curl adjuster connected to the first and second nips to              
          control the selective penetration of the first and second roll              
          compressible surfaces by the third and fourth roll substantially            
          uncompressible surfaces; and                                                
               a gate member in communication with the first and second               
          nips, the gate member sending sheets to one of the first and                
          second nips for application of respective types of curl.                    
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007