The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte OTTO M.IIG and RANDALL A. SFERRAZZA _____________ Appeal No. 2006-0472 Application 10/859,1191 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before GARRIS, PAK and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 14 through 16, which are all of the claims pending in the above-mentioned application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER The subject matter on appeal is directed to a system for making yarns of bulked continuous nylon filaments. See the 1Application for patent filed June 3, 2004. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007