The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication in and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DAVID S. HISHINUMA, KEN G. ROBERTSON,
DUSTIN ROSING, RICHARD W. DAVIS,
HAROLD MIYAMURA and JORGE E. ROCABADO
_____________
Appeal No. 2006-0476
Application No. 10/365,258
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before OWENS, LEVY, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134(a) of the final rejection
of claims 1 through 4, 6 through 15, 17 and 19 through 42, which constitute all
the claims in the application. For the reasons stated infra we affirm-in-part the
examiner’s rejection of these claims.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007