Ex Parte Sorensen et al - Page 1






                                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                         
                                  today was not written for publication and is not binding                                         
                                  precedent of the Board.                                                                          
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                       _______________                                                             
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                       _______________                                                             
                                               Ex parte DANIEL J. SORENSEN                                                         
                                                    and ROBERT LEE POPP                                                            
                                                        ______________                                                             
                                                     Appeal No. 2006-0477                                                          
                                                     Application 09/849,594                                                        
                                                       _______________                                                             
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                       _______________                                                             
               Before GARRIS, WARREN and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
               WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                
                                                REMAND TO THE EXAMINER                                                             
                       We remand the application to the examiner for consideration and explanation of issues                       
               raised by the record.  37 CFR §41.50(a)(1) (2005); Manual of Patent Examining Procedure                             
               (MPEP) § 1211 (8th ed., Rev. 3, August 2005).                                                                       
                       The official electronic records of the USPTO contain the following documents for this                       
               application:                                                                                                        
               Examiner’s answer mailed February 21, 2005;                                                                         
               Reply brief filed June 10, 2005;                                                                                    
               Supplemental examiner’s answer mailed June 20, 2005, differing solely from the answer by the                        
               addition of the initials of the second conferee on the signature page;                                              
               Supplemental reply brief filed August 18, 2005, presenting additional arguments augmenting                          
               arguments in the reply brief; and                                                                                   
               Examiner’s communication mailed November 5, 2005, stating that “[t]he [supplemental] reply                          
               brief filed 8/18/05 has been entered and considered . . . [and] forwarded to the Board.”                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007