Appeal No. 2006-0479
Application No. 10/309,274
As Joao does not overcome any of the above noted flaws in
the examiner’s evidentiary showing, we also shall not sustain the
standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claim 10 as
being unpatentable over Pulkkinen in view of Crane, Official
Notice and Joao.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 6-10, 12, 13,
15, 16, 18, 19 and 21 is reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOHN P. MCQUADE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007