Ex Parte Odegard - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2006-0497                                                                                         
              Application No. 10/444,772                                                                                   

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                             
                     The invention is directed to a system and method to increase die stand-off height                     
              in a flip chip.  Claim 1 is reproduced below.                                                                
                    1.      A system for increasing die stand-off height in a flip chip, comprising:                       
                            a die;                                                                                         
                            a substrate positioned generally parallel with, and spaced apart from, the                     
                    die;                                                                                                   
                            a plurality of separator pedestals disposed between a first face of the die                    
                    and a second face of the substrate;                                                                    
                            the first face being opposite the second face; and                                             
                            the plurality of separator pedestals being operable to selectively force the                   
                    die and substrate apart.                                                                               
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                      

              Dockerty et al. (Dockerty)                 6,053,394                    Apr. 25, 2000                        
              Earnworth et al. (Earnworth)        US 6,649,444 B2                     Nov. 18, 2003                        
                                                                               (filed Oct.  24, 2001)                      
                     Claims 1-6, 8, and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated                        
              by Earnworth.                                                                                                
                     Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                              
              Earnworth and Dockerty.                                                                                      
                     Claims 10-27 have been withdrawn from consideration.                                                  



                                                            -2-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007