The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHRISTOPH MENGEL, DIETMAR DUDEK,
MARK A. HACKLER, and
ANANDKUMAR RAMAKRISHNAN KANNURPATTI
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0511
Application No. 10/258,312
____________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before PAK, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 1 through 32, 34, 36 through 38 and 40 as
amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment dated
Dec. 1, 2004, entered as per the Advisory Action dated Dec. 21,
2004). Claims 33, 35 and 39 are the only other claims pending in
this application and are indicated as allowable (id.; see also the
Brief, page 2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007