Ex Parte Ferree et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                      
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                               
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                          
                                                   ____________                                                                              

                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                            
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                                               
                                                    ____________                                                                             
                                 Ex parte BRET A. FERREE and DAVID TOMPKINS                                                                  
                                                    ____________                                                                             
                                                Appeal No. 2006-0520                                                                         
                                              Application No. 10/303,385                                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                                             
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                               
                                                    ____________                                                                             
             Before, OWENS, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
             CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                          


                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                             
                    This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 23.                                      
             Claims 24 and 25 are objected to by the examiner as being dependent on a rejected                                               
             claim.                                                                                                                          
             The appellants' invention relates to a intervertebral disk replacement apparatus                                                
             (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to                                       
             the appellants' brief.                                                                                                          





















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007