Ex Parte Rathert - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2006-0524                                                                Παγε 2                                      
             Application No. 10/051,577                                                                                                      


                                                  BACKGROUND                                                                                 
                   The appellant's invention relates to a three-side trimmer for trimming blocks for                                         
             hardback books and in brochures (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal                                       
             is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief.                                                                          
                                                 THE PRIOR ART                                                                               
                   The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                                           
             appealed claims are:                                                                                                            
             Sarring     3,722,336   Mar. 27, 1973                                                                                           
             Mohr      5,279,196   Jan. 18, 1994                                                                                             

                                                THE REJECTIONS                                                                               
                   Claims 1, 2, 3, 8, 14, 19 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                                              
             paragraph as failing to comply with the enablement requirement.                                                                 
                   Claims 2, 14 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as                                            
             being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter                                  
             which appellant regards as the invention.                                                                                       
                   Claims 1 to 3, 8 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                                     
             unpatentable over Sarring.                                                                                                      


                                                                                                                                            



















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007