The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte GREGORY L. RAIZ, CHRISTOPHER A. EVANS, LOUIS AMADIO and AARON B. TINLING _____________ Appeal No. 2006-0538 Application No. 09/827,957 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 20. Representative claim 1 is reproduced below: 1. A method for displaying a focus state of a user interface element in a graphical user interface of a computing system, the method comprising: testing whether a control state of the user interface element is a disabled state or an active state; if the control state is the active state, detecting if the user interface element is in a focus state;Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007