The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BRIAN ROBERT VOGT,
KURT GARRETT KRUPKA,
BRADLEY M. MAROHL,
DAVID ALBERT MAXON,
ROBERT L. POPP and
MICHAEL WILLIAM PROTHEROE
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0544
Application No. 10/159,076
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, WARREN and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-19, 29, and 61 which are all of the
remaining rejected claims pending in this application. In this
regard, claims 20-28 and 30 stand objected to as depending upon a
rejected base claim by the examiner and have been indicated as
being allowable as set forth by the examiner at page 2 of the
answer. Claims 31-60 have been cancelled as set forth at page 2
of the answer.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007