Ex Parte Cluff et al - Page 3




              Appeal No. 2006-0570                                                                      3               
              Application No. 09/706,960                                                                                


              examiner, Reynolds discloses a “special flag” to determine whether a fail-safe mode is to                 
              be established in response to a previous failure.                                                         
                     The examiner concludes that it would have been obvious to use a flag to initiate                   
              recovery because Halladay’s abstract makes it clear that automation is important and                      
              Reynolds discloses that it is desirable to automate the boot disk process via automation,                 
              citing column 2, lines 1-18.                                                                              
                     Appellants contend that the combination is improper as there is no motivation to                   
              make the combination.  Appellants base this conclusion on Halladay’s disclosure of the                    
              use of a floppy disk for “cold” booting a computer in response to a memory failure, finding               
              that it is the user who must initiate the cold boot process.  Therefore, contend appellants,              
              there is no need to use a special flag since the loading of the floppy disk itself is the act for         
              starting the restoring process.  Moreover, argue appellants, Reynolds is directed to                      
              entering a fail-safe mode based on the special flag and is not concerned with restoring                   
              data from a backup device in response to this special flag.  Accordingly, appellants                      
              conclude that there would have been no reason to employ the special flag of Reynolds in                   
              the device of Halladay to start a backup process in response to that flag indicating a fault              
              has occurred with an operational element.                                                                 
                     Still further, appellants assert that even if the combination was made, the instant                
              claimed subject matter would not result since the flag recited in claim 1 must indicate if a              
              fault has occurred with the first operational element and a backup device must enable                     
              access to a network through an interface in response to the flag indicating failure of the                
              first operational element.                                                                                
                     The examiner counters with an explanation of motivation to combine as follows                      
              (answer-page 15): Halladay makes it clear that automation is important and specifically                   
              discloses a boot disk as the means by which recovery is initiated; and Reynolds discloses                 
              in the background section that boot disks are used to start up an “old-style character-                   
              based operating system” (column 1, line 57).  The examiner also asserts that Reynolds                     
              discloses in the summary of the invention portion that the invention overcomes these                      
              limitations of known systems by allowing the user to repair a GUI-based operating system                  
              by providing automatic failure recovery through a special fail-safe mode (column 2, line                  
              14).  According to the examiner, this provides “two-way motivation to combine Halladay in                 
              view of Reynolds” (answer-page 15).                                                                       
                     Moreover, the examiner explains, at pages 15-16 of the answer, a flag is merely a                  
              bit, or a Boolean indicator, which, in and of itself, has no inherent properties except for               
              being a 0 or a 1.  Therefore, in accordance with the examiner’s thinking, the flag itself does            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007