Appeal No. 2006-0600 9
Application No. 10/163,249
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dawda in view of Cummings, and
of claims 25 through 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over McLaughlin in view of Dawda and Cummings are
sustained.
To summarize, since each of the rejections before us on appeal
has been sustained, the decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007