The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DAVID WILLIAM KOEING, ANNASTACIA JANE KISTLER,
JOHN EUGENE PELUSO, MARGARET MURPHY WARD, DOUGLAS BRYAN COLE,
MARK KEVIN MELIUS and SHERRIE LYNN BENCIK
_____________
Appeal No. 2006-0609
Application No. 10/036,862
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, PAK and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 34, which are all of the claims
pending in the above-identified application. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.
APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER
Pursuant to 37 CFR § 41.37(c)(1)(vii)(2004), the appellants
have provided subheadings identifying the groups of claims argued
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007