Ex Parte MEGINNISS et al - Page 2


                  Appeal No. 2006-0626                                                                 2                   
                  Application No. 09/316,990                                                                               


                  stimulation of the salivary glands and/or salivary ducts” (specification, page 1).                       
                  Representative claim 1 reads as follows:                                                                 
                         1. An article for use in treatment of xerostomia, comprising:                                     
                         a driver assembly capable of producing a vibrating action at a drive frequency;                   
                         a stimulator assembly operatively connected to said driver assembly such that the                 
                  stimulator assembly vibrates in response to operation of the driver assembly, the                        
                  stimulator assembly including a stimulator member for vibrating a salivary member,                       
                  wherein the vibration of the stimulator member has such a frequency and amplitude                        
                  and wherein the stimulator member is so configured and arranged, conprising [sic]                        
                  substantially only a plurality of cylindrical elastomeric finger elements, substantially all             
                  of which have rounded top portions with a selected length within the range of 0.2-0.5                    
                  inches and a cross-sectional diameter within the range of 0.06-0.25 inches and are made                  
                  from an elastomeric material having a durometer in the range of 20-60 shore A, which is                  
                  sufficiently flexible, resilient and soft, that when the stimulator member is brought into               
                  contact with the salivary member, a sufficient vibrational effect is produced on the                     
                  salivary member that a significant increase in the saliva production into the oral cavity                
                  results.1                                                                                                
                                                    THE PRIOR ART                                                          
                         The references relied on by the examiner to support the final rejection are:                      
                  Michaels                            5,040,260            Aug. 20, 1991                                   
                  Giuliani et al.                    5,189,751                       Mar. 02, 1993                         
                  (Giuliani)                                                                                               
                  Roberts et al.                     5,987,688                       Nov. 23, 1999                         
                  (Roberts)                                                                                                








                                                                                                                          
                  1 In the event of further prosecution, the examiner should consider whether the recitations in claim 1 of the
                  stimulator member as “co[m]prising substantially only” a plurality of cylindrical elastomeric finger     
                  elements and in claim 12 of a stimulator configuration suitable “only” for tissue vibration outside of the
                  oral cavity present issues under the first and/or second paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 112.                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007