Ex Parte Conte - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2006-0635                                                                          
          Application No. 10/643,288                                                                    

               Attention is directed to the main and reply briefs (filed                                
          May 5, 2005 and August 17, 2005) and the final rejection and                                  
          answer (mailed December 17, 2004 and July 27, 2005) for the                                   
          respective positions of the appellant and examiner regarding the                              
          merits of these rejections.1                                                                  

                                      DISCUSSION                                                        
               Kopp, the examiner’s primary reference, discloses a toy gun                              
          for targeting flies or other insects.  The gun comprises a handle                             
          portion 1, an elongated stock 2 extending forward from the handle                             
          portion, a resilient band 5 fastened at one end to the front of                               
          the stock by a pin or staple 4, a fixed piece 7 mounted at the                                
          back of the stock for releasably engaging a free end of the                                   
          resilient band, and a resilient trigger 9 having one end portion                              
          10 secured to the bottom of the stock, an intermediate portion 12                             
          extending upwardly through an opening 3 in the stock and a second                             
          end portion 13 disposed adjacent the fixed piece.  In use, one                                
                                                                                                       
               1 In the final rejection, claim 17 also stood rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first      
          paragraph.  Upon reconsideration, the examiner has withdrawn this rejection (see page         
          3 in the answer).                                                                             















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007