Appeal No. 2006-0641
Application No. 09/416,536
to display the results of the selection (Figure 1C; column 5,
lines 52 through 55). In summary, the obviousness rejection of
claims 14 and 19 is sustained.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8,
10, 11, 13, 15, 16, 18, 20 through 23, 25 and 26 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) based upon the teachings of Anderson is affirmed, and
the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 6, 11, 16, 21
and 24 through 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) based upon the
teachings of Wilcox is affirmed as to claims 1, 6, 11, 16, 21 and
24, and is reversed as to claims 25 and 26. The decision of the
examiner rejecting claims 14 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is
affirmed.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007