Ex Parte KAMIJO et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2006-0655                                                        
          Application 09/459,287                                                      

               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                
               1. A method for authenticating digital data in a system for            
          writing digital data entered from an input device to a memory               
          device and transferring the digital data written in the memory              
          device to a receiving device, said method comprising the steps              
          of:                                                                         
               performing a first device authentication between the input             
          device and the memory device when writing digital data from the             
          input device to the memory device; and                                      
               performing a second device authentication between the memory           
          device and the receiving device when transferring the digital               
          data from the memory device to the receiving device.                        
               The following references are relied on by the examiner:                
               Altschuler et al. (Altschuler)     5,465,300  Nov.  7, 1995            
               Traw et al. (Traw)                 5,949,877  Sep.  7, 1999            
               (Filed Jan. 30, 1997)                                                  
               Steinberg                          6,510,520  Jan. 21, 2003            
                              (Filed Jun. 26, 1998)                                   
               Schneier, Bruce, Applied Cryptography, Second Edition, 1996            
          John Wiley & Sons, p.455                                                    
               Claims 1 through 5, 8 and 10 through 22 stand rejected under           
          35 U.S.C. § 103.  As to claims 1 through 3, 5, 8, 10 through 12,            
          14 through 19 and 21, the examiner relies upon Steinberg in view            
          of Traw.  To this first stated rejection the examiner adds                  
          Altschuler as to claim 4, and separately adds Schneier as to                
          claims 13, 20 and 22 in a third stated rejection.                           
               Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and the             
          examiner, reference is made to the brief (no reply brief has been           
          filed) for appellants’ positions, and to the answer for the                 
          examiner’s positions.                                                       





                                          2                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007