Ex Parte Wiedeman et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-0663                                   Page 2               
          Application No. 09/841,862                                                  
          to the gateway which is bidirectionally coupled to a data                   
          communications network.  In a further embodiment, a path is                 
          selected, utilizing stored satellite ephemeris information,                 
          through a constellation of satellites to a destination gateway              
          with  a description of the selected path being transmitted from             
          the user terminal to at least one of the constellation of                   
          satellites.                                                                 
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                  
          follows:                                                                    
          1.   A mobile satellite telecommunications system, comprising:              
               at least one user terminal;                                            
               at least one satellite in earth orbit; and                             
               at least one gateway bidirectionally coupled to a data                 
          communications network;                                                     
               said user terminal comprising a controller responsive to               
          applications for selecting individual ones of a plurality of                
          Quality of Service (QoS)modes for servicing different application           
          requirements.                                                               
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Wiedeman et al. (Wiedeman)    5,655,005      Aug. 05, 1997                  
          Roccanova                     6,522,658      Feb. 18, 2003                  
                                             (filed Jun. 07, 1999)                    
          Forslow                       6,608,832      Aug. 19, 2003                  
                                             (filed Jul. 23, 1998)                    
               Claims 1-7 and 14-20 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C.            
          § 103(a).  As evidence of obviousness, the Examiner offers                  
          Forslow in view of Roccanova with respect to claims 1-5 and 14-             
          18, and adds Wiedeman to the basic combination with respect to              
          claims 6, 7, 19, and 20.                                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007