Appeal No. 2006-0667 Application No. 09/953,310 The obviousness rejection of claim 22 is reversed because Burghartz fails to cure the noted shortcoming in the teachings of Liou. DECISION The decision of the examiner rejecting claim 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed, and the decision of the examiner rejecting claim 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ) MAHSHID D. SAADAT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) KWH/kis 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007