Ex Parte Bell et al - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                          
                   written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          



                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                               ____________                                                    
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                               ____________                                                    
                           Ex parte MERIE L. BELL and DANIEL P. BAGLEY                                         
                                               ____________                                                    
                                          Appeal No. 2006-0672                                                 
                                      Application No. 10/112,176                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                                                  ON BRIEF                                                     
                                               ____________                                                    
             Before WALTZ, TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent                                   
             Judges.                                                                                           
             WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               



             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                
                   This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of              
             claims 1 through 28, which are the only claims pending in this application.  We have              
             jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                         
                   According to appellants, the invention is directed to a method of manufacturing             
             an electrical connector for use in a downhole tool, including placing a dielectric body           
             around a conductor to form an electrical connector where the dielectric body is                   
             composed of a polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) or a derivative of a PEKK (Brief, page 2).             

                                                      1                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007