Appeal No. 2006-0674 Page 7 Application No. 10/083,565 met, does the burden of coming forward with evidence or argument shift to the applicant.” In re Rijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531, 1532, 28 USPQ2d 1955, 1956 (Fed. Cir. 1993). On this record, we find that the examiner’s initial burden4 of providing the evidence necessary to establish a prima facie case of unpatentability has not been met. Accordingly, the rejection of claims 7-9, 12 and 16-22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Donald E. Adams ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Lora M. Green ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 4 The initial burden of presenting a prima facie case of obviousness rests on the examiner. In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007