Ex Parte Willems - Page 1




                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                       
                                      for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               
                                                                                                                              
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                            
                                                       ____________                                                            
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                             
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                       ____________                                                            
                                              Ex parte ROGER P. WILLEMS                                                        
                                                       ____________                                                            
                                                   Appeal No. 2006-0679                                                        
                                                Application No. 09/997,934                                                     
                                                       ____________                                                            
                                                         ON BRIEF                                                              
                                                       ____________                                                            
              Before FRANKFORT, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
              BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               



                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      Appellant originally appealed from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-30.                        
              As indicated on page 4 of the answer (mailed April 20, 2004), the examiner has                                   
              withdrawn the rejection of claims 13-29.  Accordingly, only claims 1-12 and 30 are                               
              involved in this appeal.                                                                                         
              We REVERSE and enter a new ground of rejection.                                                                  











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007