The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ROGER P. WILLEMS ____________ Appeal No. 2006-0679 Application No. 09/997,934 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellant originally appealed from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-30. As indicated on page 4 of the answer (mailed April 20, 2004), the examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claims 13-29. Accordingly, only claims 1-12 and 30 are involved in this appeal. We REVERSE and enter a new ground of rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007