Ex Parte DeMoss et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written         
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   
                                                                                                            
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                  
                             Ex parte LARRY DEMOSS and BRUCE G. BARMAN                                       
                                               ____________                                                  
                                           Appeal No. 2006-0714                                              
                                         Application No. 10/238,083                                          
                                               ____________                                                  
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                    
                                               ____________                                                  
            Before FRANKFORT, OWENS and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
            BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               



                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection of claims 1-19, 21-48          
            and 50.                                                                                          
            We REVERSE AND REMAND.                                                                           














Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007