The opinion in support of the decision being entered today for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PAUL GLOYER, GEORGE R. WALGROVE, III,
CRISTINA DEJESUS and WILLIAM B. VREELAND
_____________
Appeal No. 2006-0739
Application 08/802,7601
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 3 through 10, 25 through 33 and 47.
Claims 11 through 24, 34 through 46 and 48, the only other claims
pending in the present application, stand withdrawn from
consideration by the examiner as being directed to a non-elected
invention. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1Application for patent filed March 8, 2001.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007