Appeal No. 2006-0742 Page
Reexamination Control No. 90/006,013 15
Figs. 1 and 5 and of receiver and drive unit 14 alone or together with other prior
art that he may be aware of.
VI. Conclusion
To summarize, the decision of the examiner (i) to reject claims 17, 18, 27,
28 and 30 as obvious over Corazzini in view of Iwasaki is affirmed, (ii) to reject
claim 21 over Corazzini in view of Iwasaki is reversed and (ii) to reject claim 48
as obvious over Corazzini is reversed.
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
________________________)
CAROL A. SPIEGEL )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
_________________________ ) BOARD OF PATENT
ROMULO H. DELMENDO ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
_________________________ )
MICHAEL P. TIERNEY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007