Ex Parte Kustov et al - Page 1



                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                         Ex parte LEONID MODESTOVICH KUSTOV,                          
                              VIKTOR IGNATYEVICH BOGDAN                               
                                         and                                          
                            VLADIMIR BORISOVICH KAZANSKY                              
                                   _____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2006-0753                                  
                               Application 09/682,010                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before PAK, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                  
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final              
          rejection of claims 1 through 5 and 14 through 16.  Claims 6                
          through 13, the other claims pending in the above-identified                
          application, stand withdrawn from consideration by the examiner             


                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007