Ex Parte Brockley et al - Page 3




               Appeal No. 2006-0770                                                                        Page 3                 
               Application No. 09/783,366                                                                                         


               namely, the lack of the recited forward and rearward interfaces, in addition to the previously                     
               identified absence of a picture on the backing material.  The appellant correctly pointed out on                   
               page 2 of the first reply brief that new grounds of rejection were not permitted in an examiner’s                  
               answer under 37 CFR § 1.193(a)(2) in effect at the time the first answer was mailed but did not                    
               petition the new ground under 37 CFR § 1.181.  In any event, the application was returned by the                   
               Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences to the examiner in an order mailed July 20, 2005                         
               because the answer was defective for not stating the ground(s) of rejection therein.  In the                       
               substitute answer, the examiner repeated the explanation of the rejection as stated in the first                   
               answer and positively stated the ground of rejection to be under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                          
               unpatentable over Wilson in view of Feher and Rand.  At the time of the mailing of the second                      
               answer, 37 CFR § 41.39(a)(2), which now permits new grounds of rejection in an examiner’s                          
               answer, was in effect.                                                                                             
                      Wilson discloses a cap display apparatus for displaying a cap having a bill connected to a                  
               collapsible crown, such as a baseball cap, the apparatus comprising a transparent plastic window                   
               piece 13 having a hollow form 15 portion and flat portions above and below the hollow form                         
               portion, the hollow form portion defining a cavity 31 for holding the cap 21 for display.  A piece                 
               of backing material 33 made of conventional matting material provides a contrasting                                
               background for the cap, the display surface 35 of the backing material 33 contacting the rear                      
               surface of the window piece 13 such that the display surface shows through the front surface 16                    
               of the window piece.  A rigid back 39 contacts the backing material 33 and provides support and                    
               rigidity to both the window piece 13 and backing material 33.  A rectangular frame 41 includes a                   
               semicircular front retaining edge 43 and a box-shaped rear retaining edge 45, spaced apart so that                 
               the window piece, backing material and rigid back are urged to remain in intimate contact with                     
               each other and are slightly compressed between the front retaining edge 43 and the rear retaining                  
               edge 45.                                                                                                           









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007