Appeal No. 2006-0790 Reexamination Control No. 90/005,117 Damark discloses a manual treadmill identified as “Wilson Manual Treadmill” comprising: a base that necessarily includes a frame having a front, a rear, left side, and a right side with an endless belt positioned between the left side and the right 5 side; and a handle extending from the base. (FF7.) Damark further teaches that the treadmill may be folded vertically. (FF8.) Indeed, we note that the appellant acknowledges Damark’s disclosure as follows (FF9; request for reexamination filed on September 25, 1998 at 3): 10 The Damark reference depicts a manual folding treadmill having a tread base rotatably attached to an upright support structure, wherein the point of attachment is intermediate the front and rear of the tread base. 15 Damark also describes the provision of front wheels to allow easy movement and easy storage of the treadmill. (FF10.) That Damark discloses the above elements or limitations has not been contested. 20 After considering the scope and content of the prior art relative to the claimed invention, the examiner determined that Damark “discloses all the limitations of the claims, except for a gas spring connected between the tread base and the upright structure to assist in stably retaining said tread base in said 25 second position relative to said upright structure with said 18Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007