Ex Parte Shalit - Page 8



        Appeal No. 2006-0811                                                            
        Application No. 10/323,510                                                      

                                 DECISION                                               
             The rejections of claims 1-4, 9-11, 14 and 15 under                        
        35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over Adkison, claims 6 and 13 under 35 U.S.C.                
        § 103 over Adkison in view of Hankins, claim 7 under 35 U.S.C.                  
        § 103 over Adkison in view of McAllister, and claim 8 under                     
        35 U.S.C. § 103 over Adkison in view of Corday, are affirmed.                   
        The rejections of claims 1, 11 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                  
        over Bingo, claims 5 and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Adkison in               
        view of Hankins, claims 21, 24 and 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over                
        Bingo in view of Hankins, and claims 17-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
        over Bingo in view of Adkison, are reversed.                                    





                                                                                       
        there is adequate antecedent basis for "said step of drawing in a               
        drawing area" in claim 17, "the step of drawing" in claim 24, and               
        "said drawing area on said game board" in claim 25.                             





                                    8                                                   











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007